Compare and contrast the physical descriptions of David and Goliath

Locating the key to answer for the moment is a breeze. clickanswer.us offers accurate question and answer services. we provide a concise answer key and complete with the discussion. We provide a range of answer keys that range from junior high, elementary and high school. The subjects we offer include biology, mathematics, physics as well as economics, history, and many more. Below are the question and answers that have been summarized from various sources on the internet.

Question:

Compare and contrast the physical descriptions of David and Goliath

Answer:

Goliath, according to the biblical account, was a giant soldier from the city of Gath and champion of the Philistine army, who besieged the armies of Israel for forty days. Goliath was extraordinarily high for the average even by today’s standards. The writings cipher his height in six elbows and one span (2.9 m). His copper mail coat weighed 5,000 shekels (57 kg), and the iron blade of his spear was 600 shekels (6.8 kg). He was one of the Refaim, and he may have been a mercenary soldier in the Philistine army. It is necessary to note that the height described in the Bible about Goliath is approximately 2.90 meters.

READ MORE :  In statistics, results are always reported with 100% certainty only when discrete variables are measured. Results cannot be reported with 100% certainty when continuous variables are measured. T/F

In the Bible David is considered a just, brave, passionate king; warrior, musician and poet, not exempt from sins. According to the Bible, he was chosen by God in person to govern Israel. The Bible does not specify a description of David’s physique, but if he is described as the youngest of a group of brothers, he was a pastor and when it came to fighting Goliath, he was so small that the king’s armor slid down his body .

READ MORE :  Due to the short-term environmental change of a drought, much of the soil in an area can no longer support a species of wildflower. As a result, the plants now grow only in small regions within the area. Which effect of an environmental change does this best illustrate? migration loss of habitat adaptation extinction

You can use the answer key above as a reference when studying at home and at school. We appreciate your visit, hopefully it will be beneficial to all of us.

Leave a Comment